The FBI had credible intelligence in 2016 about the Clinton campaign’s alleged scheme to falsely link Donald Trump to Russia — and instead of investigating, they turned a blind eye, according to a newly declassified Durham annex that’s sending shockwaves through Washington.
Story Highlights
- Declassified Durham annex exposes FBI’s failure to probe Clinton campaign’s possible role in Russia collusion narrative
- FBI received intelligence in 2016 flagging a plan to tie Trump to Russia, but ignored the lead
- Key details hidden from Congress and the public until August 2025
- Republicans demand answers; trust in federal law enforcement at new lows
FBI Sat on Clinton Intel, Ignored Red Flags in 2016
Newly revealed documents confirm the FBI was handed intelligence in 2016 suggesting the Hillary Clinton campaign may have orchestrated a plan to falsely connect Donald Trump to Russian election interference, yet the Bureau failed to take basic investigative steps. The declassified annex to Special Counsel John Durham’s 2023 report, made public in August 2025, details how this warning was swept under the rug as the FBI plowed ahead with its now-infamous “Crossfire Hurricane” probe into Trump’s supposed Russian ties. For years, the public was told the FBI followed every lead to protect democracy — but the truth is the Bureau ignored the most damning one, because it pointed in the wrong political direction. The American people deserve answers, not another round of bureaucratic stonewalling.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6376411339112
The timeline is damning. In 2016, U.S. intelligence intercepted information indicating the Clinton campaign’s potential role in manufacturing the Trump-Russia narrative. The FBI, rather than investigating the Clinton connection, doubled down on targeting Trump’s campaign. The main Durham report, released in 2023, raised questions about the Bureau’s procedures, but this annex — hidden from the public and Congress until now — exposes just how deep the failures ran. It’s not just incompetence; it’s a dereliction of duty that undermined the integrity of the election and public trust in our institutions.
Republicans Demand Accountability as Washington Scrambles
Republican lawmakers, led by Senator Chuck Grassley, are demanding answers and calling for new oversight hearings. Grassley, who fought for the annex’s declassification, stressed that Congress and the public were kept in the dark for years while top FBI officials dodged uncomfortable questions. The Senate Judiciary Committee has released statements highlighting the annex’s significance: it supports long-held suspicions that the Trump-Russia investigation was not only politically motivated but may have been deliberately constructed by the Clinton campaign — and that the FBI, at best, looked the other way. The DOJ and CIA formally transmitted the document to Congress on August 1, 2025, after mounting pressure for transparency.
The media and public are now scrutinizing the FBI’s conduct with renewed urgency. The annex’s release has triggered a firestorm in Washington, with renewed calls for investigations, resignations, and even criminal referrals. For years, Trump supporters have argued that the Russia probe was a partisan hit job; now, the evidence is out in the open for all to see. The left, predictably, claims the annex is being “over-interpreted,” but the facts speak for themselves. This is not just about politics — it’s about the rule of law, and whether federal agencies can be trusted to act impartially when elections are at stake.
Expert Opinions: FBI’s Credibility on the Line
Legal and intelligence experts agree: these revelations are serious, and they go well beyond the usual partisan sniping. The annex’s declassification, spearheaded by senior oversight figures like Grassley, lends it significant credibility. Even those who argue the annex requires further corroboration admit it exposes systemic weaknesses in how the FBI handles politically sensitive intelligence. Some intelligence scholars warn that raw intelligence alone does not prove criminal intent or direct involvement by the Clinton campaign; others counter that the FBI’s apparent lack of curiosity about the Clinton tip, while obsessively pursuing the Trump angle, speaks volumes about institutional bias.
Public trust in federal law enforcement — already battered by years of scandals and leaks — is now scraping bottom. If the FBI can simply ignore intelligence that contradicts the narrative they want, can anyone have faith in their investigations? The fallout from this annex is likely to extend far beyond the Beltway, fueling debates over election interference, FBI reform, and the fundamental fairness of our justice system. Calls for congressional hearings, independent investigations, and real accountability are growing louder by the day. The American people are right to demand answers. When government agencies play politics, everyone loses — and the Constitution is left hanging by a thread.